The (as yet, unreported) decision of the Court of
Appeal in the matter of The Chief Officer, Customs & Excise,
Immigration and Nationality Service -v- Garnet Investments Limited
could have wide ramifications for the banking industry and those
regularly subject to the reporting regimes under the Criminal
Justice (Proceeds of Crime) (Bailiwick of Guernsey Law 1999 (the
Proceeds Law). Here David O'Hanlon looks at the view of the
Court of Appeal in Garnet that the burden of demonstrating whether
or not the funds a bank holds are 'tainted' falls on the bank,
rather than its customer or the Financial Intelligence Service.