The nature of a beneficiary’s interest under a Jersey law trust

An article by Group Partner Sam Williams has been published in Trust & Trustees magazine on the topic of the nature of a beneficiary’s interest under a Jersey law trust, looking at Kea Investments v Watson in its historical context.

In Kea Investments v Watson [2021] JRC 009, the Royal Court of Jersey considered for the first time whether a beneficiary’s interest under a discretionary trust could be the subject of distraint by a judgment creditor. Sam's article places the decision in its historical context and argues that it reflects the inherent difficulty in reconciling a system of property law which in Jersey has its roots in the customary law of Normandy, and the quintessentially English law concept of the trust as transposed to the island.

To read the full article click here.

Related articles

Insight +
Cayman Islands introduces new pre-action discovery mechanism
09/04/26 The Cayman Islands Grand Court (the Court) has introduced a significant enhancement to its...
Insight +
Generative AI and legal privilege: What boards need to know
01/04/26 Generative AI is already part of how many organisations work, and staff will increasingly ...
Insight +
Mind the gap: Why the wider role prevails for protectors
26/03/26 On 19 March 2026, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council ('JCPC') delivered its judgm...
Insight +
Cayman Islands reserved powers trusts: A sophisticated approach to integrat...
24/03/26 Introduction to Cayman reserved powers trusts The Cayman Islands (Cayman) has long set the...