The nature of a beneficiary’s interest under a Jersey law trust

An article by Group Partner Sam Williams has been published in Trust & Trustees magazine on the topic of the nature of a beneficiary’s interest under a Jersey law trust, looking at Kea Investments v Watson in its historical context.

In Kea Investments v Watson [2021] JRC 009, the Royal Court of Jersey considered for the first time whether a beneficiary’s interest under a discretionary trust could be the subject of distraint by a judgment creditor. Sam's article places the decision in its historical context and argues that it reflects the inherent difficulty in reconciling a system of property law which in Jersey has its roots in the customary law of Normandy, and the quintessentially English law concept of the trust as transposed to the island.

To read the full article click here.

Related articles

Insight +
Is there a requirement to file a Shareholders' Agreement under Jersey law?
02/09/25 A question we are regularly asked by clients is whether a shareholders' agreement (Shareho...
Insight +
Challenges to (in)adequate deliberation after Dawson-Damer – a reminder for...
01/09/25 Dawson-Damer – an introduction In a landmark decision of the Privy Council, Ashley Dawson-...
Insight +
Enforcement of judgments in the Cayman Islands - latest trends and developm...
01/09/25 The Cayman Islands has developed a framework for the enforcement of foreign judgments (inc...
Insight +
Jardine Strategic: Privy Council rejects efforts to shut dissenters out, ab...
21/08/25 On 24 July 2025, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council handed down two important dec...