In the matter of Re: S

Collas Crill acted as the representative party for minor / unborn beneficiaries in an opposed application by the trustees for the Court's blessing of their decision to dispose of an asset held by the trust.

The property was held in a US company structure. The asset was held under the terms of the trust for the ultimate benefit of the minor beneficiaries (this firm's clients).

The trustees' application for blessing of its decision failed. This firm, the beneficiaries' mother and protector all opposed the sale.

Related articles

Case +
Limitless: Liquidators, injunctions and cross-undertakings in damages
04/07/23 The English Court of Appeal (the Court of Appeal) has recently issued a judgment which wil...
Case +
The next generation of corporate rescue in the Cayman Islands: Lessons from...
10/03/23 This article was originally published in ThoughtLeaders4 FIRE Magazine. Read the full issu...
Case +
Companies: Just and equitable winding up
06/03/23 Lynne Calder, Of Counsel in the Jersey Dispute Resolution team, was appointed by the Royal...
Case +
Offshore trusts: Limits of the revenue rule in Jersey (Re Mattas)
14/02/23 This article first appeared on LexisPSL Private Client on 01.02.2023 Overview Private Clie...